These ‘Inactive’ Ingredients in COVID Vaccines Could Trigger Allergic Reactions

These ‘Inactive’ Ingredients in COVID Vaccines Could Trigger Allergic Reactions

COVID vaccine makers have not only introduced new primary ingredients to the U.S. vaccine stage, but they’ve bundled these new ingredients with “inactive” ingredients in unprecedented ways that raise the risk for dangerous allergic reactions.

The CDC claims that vaccines “use only the ingredients they need to be as safe and effective as possible.”  The star of the show in any vaccine is the “active” ingredient, which is the one designed to create an antibody response. But the other, supposedly inactive” ingredients — known as excipients — also play significant, and in many cases risky, co-starring roles.

Studies of licensed vaccines have identified many problems with these secondary ingredients — adjuvants like aluminum, preservatives like thimerosal and stabilizers like gelatin — not to mention highlighting the presence in vaccines of residual DNA from cell lines used in the manufacturing process as well as disclosed and undisclosed contaminants.

 

Inactive COVID Ingredients

With the advent of three experimental COVID injections approved for emergency use in the U.S., manufacturers have introduced new primary ingredients to the U.S. vaccine stage — messenger RNA (mRNA) in the Pfizer and Moderna injections and an adenovirus vector in the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) injection.

Not only that, but vaccine makers have bundled these new primary ingredients with  “inactive” excipients in unprecedented wayspolyethylene glycol (PEG) in the case of the mRNA vaccines and polysorbate 80 in the J&J shot.

PEGs and polysorbates are structurally similar and are also sometimes combined in a PEG-polysorbate 80 mixture that is “substantially the same as that of … pure PEG.” Pre-COVID, both compounds had already been flagged for their ability to cross-react and produce immediate hypersensitivity reactions, a type of “exaggerated or inappropriate” immune response that can include anaphylaxis.

Given that at least 1,689 recipients of the Pfizer and Moderna injections have reported anaphylactic or serious allergic reactions (as of March 5), and that two J&J clinical trial participants also suffered severe allergic reactions, some allergy experts are recommending that closer attention be directed to the risks of both excipients.

Read the FULL Article at Children’s Health Defence

 

Censorship of Vaccine Safety Advocates

With undeniable research, science as well as empirical evidence of the potential adverse health events from ‘inactive’ ingredients in vaccines, WHY then isn’t this being discussed in public forums.  Why isn’t there any transparent information – informed consent – being provided to the public to help them make a choice about vaccination.

As discussed on Children’s Health Defence, the Censorship Plan started back in October 2020 with Event 201.

In October 2019, shortly before the COVID outbreak, Gates and other powerful individuals began planning how to censor vaccine safety advocates from social media during a table-top simulation of a worldwide pandemic, known as Event 201.

Gates’ Event 201 script imagines vast anti-vaccine riots triggered by internet posts. The universal and single-minded presumption among its participants was that such a crisis would prove an opportunity of convenience to promote new vaccines, and tighten controls by a surveillance and censorship state.   Read the Full Article here.

To understand the bigger picture of all this, you have to follow the money…

Wellcome Trust and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation stand to profit handsomely from their investments in drug companies researching solutions for the pandemic. Some say that raises critical questions around conflicts of interest, transparency and accountability.

An increasingly clear feature of the COVID-19 pandemic is that the public health response is being driven not only by governments and multilateral institutions, such as the World Health Organisation, but also by a welter of public-private partnerships involving drug companies and private foundations.

Linsey McGoey, a professor of sociology at the University of Essex says, “They seem to be wholly committed to a charitable model … [that] seems to really conflict with the health justice and vaccine justice approach that most global south activists and policy makers are calling for.

“These foundations sort of perpetuate the false ideological impression that they are … solving the problem even when they’re not. And they might be compounding it by perpetuating this ideological impression of private sector saviourism.”

Read the Full article by Tim Schwab
The BMJ March 3, 2021, written by Tim Schwab,

 

Latest Journal Posts

Libra Full Moon + Lunar Eclipse – March 2024

Our FIRST Full Moon of the Astrological New Year— Full Moon in Libra, reflecting the LIGHT of the Sun in Aries. There is a ...

Pisces New Moon – March 2024 – Sacred Sensuality

Our March 2024 Pisces New Moon, takes us deep into our Sacred Sexuality, the Sensuality of our Bodies, & the warming Bosom of ...

Leo Full Moon – January 2024

Whilst Full Moons can be challenging with the Moon & Sun sitting on opposite sides of the zodiac, they can also be ...

Shop Online

Handmade, HeartFull & Soulicious

Follow the journey on Instagram

Scroll to Top