This study published on ScienceDirect.com in January 2021, concludes emphatically that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19.

This will be my LAST post of FaceMasks, to be honest I am quite over the discussion of a topic which common sense can establish limits your intake of oxygen, raises your carbon dioxide and over-all severely hampers your innate immunity.   It’s not rocket science, and now the latest science proves it!

Medical mandates have locked us up (limiting the diversity of our microbiome hence our immunity),  limited our important exposure to the Sun hence our production of Vit D (again, limiting our immunity), and tried to enforce the wearing of masks, even double or triple masking, which have now been shown to not only be ineffective but also detrimental to our immunity!  And as humans thrive through connection, we have been kept separate from each other, and then deplatformed if we speak up against Govt/BigPharma propaganda.   What on Earth happened to critical thinking and open & transparent communication ?

And with the latest announcement that ‘moist masks’ are recommend, I think the stupidity index has now gone off the rails – moisture becomes a BREEDING ground for PATHOGENS.   The propaganda now is becoming so absurd, I feel that there is no point in wasting any more bandwidth on a topic that is bridging upon insanity.

I personally will NEVER wear a mask (see exemptions here in Australia).  I will not be shamed or coerced into hampering my ability to be healthy or belittled by the misleading psyop comments that I am putting others in danger.  This dark agenda does not frighten me.  Right from the beginning I have published ways for the vulnerable to improve their innate immunity and support themselves body, mind & soul.   Why hasn’t our Governments or Medical Establishments (bolstered by the Media) even bothered to do the same ?  

Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis

Regarding the Published Study mentioned above, here is the Concluding summary:

The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of wearing facemask as preventive intervention for COVID-19. The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks.

Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immuno-suppression, fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression.

Long-term consequences of wearing facemask can cause health deterioration, developing and progression of chronic diseases and premature death. Governments, policy makers and health organizations should utilize prosper and scientific evidence-based approach with respect to wearing facemasks, when the latter is considered as preventive intervention for public health.

The Social Cult of FaceMasks

As Dr Sherri Tenpenny writes: Wearing a mask has almost become nearly a cult-like participation and for some, masking seems to be a new fashion statement. There’s even a name given to those who refuse to wear a mask: bare face. Many governors have made masks mandatory, even if they have no legislative authority to do so. 

Dr Tenpenny has researched the medical literature, searching for scientific proof that masks do what we are told they do: stop the spread of infection and protect the person who wears the mask from becoming ill. After reviewing more than 50 articles, here’s what she discovered:

• There are NO randomized, controlled trials (RCT) with verified outcomes that show a benefit to healthcare workers or community members for wearing a mask or a respirator. There is no such definitive study. Likewise, no study exists that shows a benefit from a broad policy to wear masks in public (documented below).
• Furthermore, if there were any benefits to wearing a mask, because of the blocking power against droplets and aerosol particles, then there should be more benefit from wearing a respirator (N95) compared to a surgical mask. There is not. Neither masks nor respirators protect; cloth coverings are essentially worthless.
• It should be noted that the surgical masks are primarily designed to protect the environment from the wearer, whereas the respirators are supposed to protect the wearer from the environment. (Balazy, et al).
• Coronavirus are <0.125 microns in size. Masks and respirators filter particles 0.30 to 0.80 microns in size. Masks cannot possibly work. No bias-free study has ever found a benefit from wearing a mask or respirator in this application.

The pdf document found Here: Masks-Final has detailed references to back up these assertions. It’s time for us to revolt against the tyranny of our “rulers” with science that supports our decision to breathe oxygen, eliminate carbon dioxide and support a healthy immune system.

The Psyop of FaceMasks

As Kelly Brogan writes:   For generations, children the world over have been raised in authoritarian households, defined by hierarchical power dynamics, punished for deviant individual expression, and rewarded for sheepish compliance, ultimately disconnected from their own drives, interests, and intuition.

This is how we learned to experience obedience and rule–following as a virtue. In our survival-based programming, we abandon ourselves, our needs, and even the investigation of our beliefs in a flight toward “doing the right thing.”

The vast majority of us are still operating with our power center externalized from our being — traumatized and imprinted — and terrified of death, we are easily controlled. We are also easily controlled because we are empathic and couldn’t possibly fathom a reality where those so disconnected from their heart centers might be decades into agendas that require our essential dehumanization, oppression, and enslavement. We are controllable because we care, we want to be loved, we want to be protected, and we want approval.

Psychological operations (or “psyops”), which include the selective presentation of emotionally-provocative information for behavioral manipulation, have been employed by governments for decades to retain and advance population-based control and financial servitude. Project Mockingbird, Operation Paperclip, and MK-Ultra are but a few of the publicly acknowledged secret programs that included human experimentation that utilize brainwashing techniques to deceive, program, and manipulate behavior.

Often, these operations seed our consciousness with divisiveness while overtly appearing to support societal victims. I call it coddling the victim, which appears altruistic, but ultimately reifies the disempowerment of factions of society that serves the divide-and-conquer agenda. 

As Keven Ryan writes, in his article Is the Coronavirus Scare a Psychological Operation?,

Governments have used psychological warfare throughout history to manipulate public opinion, gain political advantage, and generate profits. Western governments have engaged in such tactics in the war on terrorism as well as in its predecessor, the war on communism.

In both cases, state-sponsored terrorism and propaganda were used to distort the public’s perception of the threats, leading to increased governmental control of society and huge financial benefits for corporations.  It appears that the same kinds of effects are being seen as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

What does this Global COVID experience have to do with Psyops.   Here’s how this ‘pandemic’ equates with previous Psyops:

1. Fear-based and globally directed
2. Media saturation with bias toward fear
3. Data manipulation and propaganda
4. Censorship of opposing views
5. Intelligence agency control of information
6. Preceded by exercises mimicking the threat
7. Series of claims made that are later proven false
8. Response threatens democracy
9. Large increase in wealth and power for a few; increase in social inequality
10. Increased government control of the public and reduced individual freedoms
11. Response kills far more than the original threat
12. Evidence for manufactured events