If EVER there was a time to critically think & intuitively feel into your Heart then NOW is that time.
When the ABC publishes an article that declares the ‘Nuremberg Code from WWII has nothing to do with coronavirus…‘, then if you haven’t already begun to question, then NOW is the time to be alert, aware & take action. It amuses me too that the full headline includes ‘despite bogus Facebook claims’, as if to give legitimacy to their statement!
The image is of Karl Brandt, Adolph Hitlers doctor who was appointed as co-head of the Aktion T4 – the involuntary euthanisation of up to 300,000 people deemed ‘not fit for human life’ due to pre-existing health conditions. Racial hygiene was deemed important to ensure purity of genetics, and that resources were not wasted on these ‘useless feeders’. I have previously shared insights from Vera Sharav, a Holocaust survivor, about how this moment is potentially leading down the path of another devastating Auschwitz moment, but on a Global scale.
What is the Nuremberg Code ?
The Nuremberg Code came into being in 1947, in Nuremberg, Germany, following the trial of a group of Nazi doctors accused of conducting ‘Crimes Against Humanity’. At the conclusion of the Trial, in what is often referred to as ‘The Doctors Trial’, 16 people were found guilty.
The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide. This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behavior for the post World War II human rights era. Amongst other requirements, this document enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. The principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control his own body.
This code also recognizes that the risk must be weighed against the expected benefit, and that unnecessary pain and suffering must be avoided. This code recognizes that doctors should avoid actions that injure human patients. The principles established by this code for medical practice now have been extended into general codes of medical ethics.
Please also keep in mind, that through Operation Paper-Clip, many Nazi Scientists & their families were brought to America, though this indeed is food for another post!
Before reading the 10 Standards of the Nuremberg Code below, you may wish to first watch this VIDEO in FULL. And maybe even read some of the stories of Vaccine Death & Serious Adverse Events from REAL people on my Pfizer, Moderna & AstraZeneca pages.
Then as you read through the 10 Standards of the Nuremberg Code, please reflect upon the ‘Medical Crimes’ experienced by REAL people. Do you feel that Medical Ethics have been upheld? Considering that other treatment options have been heavily censored, that ALL of the Jabs are still in Stage III Global Trials, and that now they are jabbing our children whereby the risk of damage from the jab is GREATER than the virus itself, how do you feel about this ? Not to mention the FULL SCALE Medical Coercion tactics that have been ramping up over the last weeks – Million Dollar Lotteries (there are many of these, here is another one, and here are Australia’s versions), coercive IceCream for Children to have the jab WITHOUT parents consent, & recommendations for people to ‘don’t ask Questions, just get the jab!‘. ANY TYPE of Vaccine Coercion or Blackmail is unacceptable.
The Nuremberg Code – 1947
Standard 1: The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
Standard 2: The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
Standard 3: The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
Standard 4: The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
Standard 5: No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
Standard 6: The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
Standard 7: Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
Standard 8: The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
Standard 9: During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
Standard 10: During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
Dr Reiner Fuellmich – Morally Grotesque ?
As I have previously written, German-American lawyer Dr Reiner Fuellmich is leading the charge to have the US Centers For Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], the World Health Organisation [WHO] and the “Davos Group” tried for “crimes against humanity”. As stated in the ABC Article “Among a number of unsubstantiated, misleading and false claims attributed to Dr Reiner Fuellmich are suggestions that COVID-19 vaccines are “in violation of all 10 of the Nuremberg Codes”.
I personally find this assertion interesting. Basically a team of Journalists (directed by their Big Media bosses), and ‘Fact Checkers’ are now doing a trial by media of Dr Reiner Fuellmich’s claims? A professional who is spearheading a legal challenge to assertain the truth. What gives Media/FactChekers the authority, or the legal & medical noush to competently weigh in on the claims of a highly regarded expert ?
UK Full Fact, is a prime example of this type of propaganda. It’s Nuremberg Fact Check page has determined that correlating The Nuremberg Code with COVID jabs is morally grotesque. It goes onto say that ‘Misinformation thrives when feelings are manipulated in this way, as claims which create an emotional response are most likely to be shared. Yet when you read the Fact Check page, aren’t their claims about the TRUTH very much emotionally charged & manipulative, particularly using words like ‘Morally Grotesque’. In fact, isn’t it ‘morally grotesque’ for the Media to be a legal system unto themselves and play judge, jury & executioner?
Why isn’t MSM/Fact Checkers being honest & open, and asking WHY Dr Reiner Fuellmich is conducting this investigation & legal challenge, and doing everything in their power to look behind the facade of the story being spun, and honestly & openly doing everything in their power to discern the truth. Could it be because they are part of the problem? I really don’t feel holocaust survivor Vera Sharav would at anytime find Dr Reiner Fuellmich assertions ‘morally grotesque’., and in fact Dr Fuellmich has already taken testimony from Vera. If anything, I believe she would find consider him a man of honour.
Dr. Stephanie Seneff – Possible Consequences of mRNA Vaccines
In consideration of the never before mRNA being used in what I believe is an ‘experiment’ upon humanity, I would like to share with you two video’s that support your research.
Dr. Stephanie Seneff is a Senior Research Scientist at MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory in Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. She has a BS degree from MIT in biology and a PhD from MIT in electrical engineering and computer science.
Dr. Stephanie Seneff’s latest article is Worse Than The Disease: Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19. In my opinion this article directly explains HOW the Nuremberg-esque crimes against humanity are taking place. A great summary of this article can be found here.
What to do about the Anti-Vaxxers ?
Whilst the media maybe turning their back on the atrocities taking place, and for that matter even stoking the fire & being complicit, here is a dark side of what is happening. Is society being split into two? To me this shows that a Nuremberg 2.0 is needed more than evern.
And here is a discussion by Mary Holland, Children’s Health Defense president, and Polly Tommey, co-producer of “Vaxxed,”, fast-forward to 37.35 minutes, and learn how the unvaxxed have been unable to access medical treatment.